MGNREGS- An impact study of the world's largest employer using the concept of 3 F's
MGNREGS (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme) was launched during UPA-I regime in 2005 in a phased manner and got implemented across the nation in 2008. It is always associated with “paradigm shift” in rural development schemes because of its following remarkable, distinct and unprecedented characteristics/features-
- bottom-up
- people-centred
- demand-driven
- self-selecting (Gram Sabha)
- rights-based approach (Right2Work;1st amongst R2Food, R2Education,R2Info.)
1st F is the Functionaries-DRDA, PO, PRS and Mukhiya/Sarpanch.
Let’s start
with PO i.e. Program Officer. One may inquire why I started with PO
Sahab, a block level personnel and not DRDA, a district level agency. It has been intentionally done as it’s so difficult to explain
him, his qualifications, his works, his attitude & behavior, his salary
constancy and his managerial skills. He is an MBA graduate and joined MGNREGS
with vigor and energy, filled with positivity and sometimes a dream to change
the rural landscape. He acts as a bridge between district DRDA and Gram
Panchayat Mukhiya, PRS when it comes to map the governmental Functionaries and
that between people and his staff at block and panchayat levels. When he
joined, he was told that he would be a parallel authority in block with BDO
Sahab (looking after law and order) and him being the nodal authority for
MGNREGS. A decent salary (in 2007, considered so) in governmental setup and a
BOSS of a scheme at block level and a parallel authority were enough for
them to join (and continues to retain almost ALL of them). But due to no- revision (promised and reiterated many a times) of their salaries, now they have been left behind by other authorities (who were very behind in the salary race) and have a sub-standard package (in accordance with their qualifications). Being such a bridge takes a lot in managing the illiterate, poor and yet wise rural community, which still considers government schemes as tangible benefits (non-returnable/ non-refundable support/loan).
Next being PRS, soul and body of the scheme. He may rank 2nd here but often assumed to be topper in several aspects. Withdraw him from the scheme and see the world- a non-corrupt one as claimed by majority. He is the sarve-sarva of the scheme at panchayat level (though Mukhiya holds a significant hold in picking people to work, labour payments, Social Audit, Materials like Sand, Bricks etc. on credit from the market etc.). A lot of serious questions on his work and non-work related matters can be as follows-




The genesis
of this thinking that lower level or ground level staff are more corrupt than
the higher level employees(Babus) is what was the basic reason for “BUDHWAARI
JAANCH”(Wednesday Inspection) under which
all the
NREGA works done in a Panchayat on field and paper works in recent years were inspected. At
the time of its introduction/inception, it was considered to be Anna Hazare's Lokpal type revolutionary exercise, which would put a full stop to the rampant corruption occurring in the
scheme. As time passed by, the contrary was observed and it was soon realised that it has become
an ultimate tool of rampant corruption in the name of Recovery and
sometimes even PRS were forced to resign if not pay bribes. I am afraid that in
a situation like this the world’s most ambitious and largest employment
generating and guaranteeing scheme (as per the law in letter if not in spirit) may
turn out to be advantageous for those who need it lesser than for those who are
in dire need of the same. An irony and failure on the part of governance of the country is that the poverty-alleviation cum socialist/welfare state oriented schemes have benefitted the middle class and rich more than the needy and targeted poor (Mathew effect). This has been the past of schemes/reforms in the
nation and the future is calling for the same even in NREGA.
Coming on to the IInd “F” viz. “Functions” after the above “F” viz. “Functionaries”.
Under this
we would discuss the positive and negatives (if any) of the functions undertook
by the scheme i.e. Impact Study of the scheme via its works on the ground.
a.
Roads- An ultimate positive achievement of the
scheme has been ROADS. Five years back, we had only PMGSY (thanks to AB
Vajpayee, the most recent Bharat Ratna recipient) for rural India apart from NH
and SH. Today, if you reach the Indian villages via roads, you would be taken
aback when you observe roads (not the BLACK ones, but WHITE- signifying
strength and durabilility). PMGSY provided external road connectivity to the villages
from the main roads (NH/SH) unlike the internal connectivity provided by
MGNREGA.
Types of rural roads-from yesterday 2 tomorrow
PAST- Kachhi Sadak and Brick Soiling
PRESENT- PCC and above 2
FUTURE- PCC only.
This is what MGNREGA has done, a remarkable present and a probable and promising future of connectivity in the heart of the country.
PAST- Kachhi Sadak and Brick Soiling
PRESENT- PCC and above 2
FUTURE- PCC only.
This is what MGNREGA has done, a remarkable present and a probable and promising future of connectivity in the heart of the country.
Drains
Toilets
Soakpits
There was a time when one could not think about seeing a single drain in the villages (despite the fact that urban sanitation itself is poor and stinking even today). But MGNREGA brought a remarkable item in its basket of works and then rural sanitation got a kick-start and naalas were constructed. Today the mindset of people has changed to such a level that when asked about the needs of the ward (village), PCC roads and/or drains are the top most priority areas they want the government and the scheme to work on. This is evident from IPPE (Planning exercise in the scheme) where almost every ward of the state unanimously declared their most important work as PCC/Drains, leaving behind the individual works like Goatery/Poultry shed etc. and even the heart of the agrarian society i.e. irrigation-renovation of the traditional water bodies like chaur/payne etc.
The last “F”
i.e. Funds, the most crucial aspect of life-public (schemes) or private
(pockets), has been dealt in the end since the proper utilisation of this “F”
is possible only when the former F’s succeed in their respective roles and
responsibilities.
Fund flow in
a CSS is generally smooth from centre to states but this scheme has been an
exception. Being the brainchild of UPA, various sources have repeatedly quoted
Modi-led NDA government’s intentions to scrap the scheme or restrict it to
tribal and backward blocks only. But all these news have been mere news and
rumours. But one think is true that post-NDA government, the beneficiaries or
functionaries at district/block/panchayat level haven’t received a single penny
for last 10 months, endangering the livelihoods of many and encouraging
migration of many.
The
policy-makers must be appreciated for a transformational and splendid job in
mode of payment of the beneficiaries. Starting from Post-Offices to Bank A/c to
electronic Fund Management System (e-FMS), the scheme and its beneficiaries
especially have witnessed and faced a lot to receive the wages they deserve for
the work they do. Ranging from weekly to monthly to semi-annually wage payment,
the beneficiaries (unskilled labour force) can’t be expected to stop migrating
to Punjab, Haryana and Delhi for better and timely paid works. What makes it
worse is the corrupt practices of the dominant Functionaries especially at
Panchayat level (Mukhiya/Sarpanch/PRS etc.).
But even
after all above negatives of the scheme in monetary matters, one can’t deny the
fact that the bargaining power of these labourers-cum-MGNREGS beneficiaries
have increased significantly. The labour who was earlier forced to work for
Rs.80-100 now easily asks for Rs.180-200, a jump of more than 100% is the
direct outcome of the scheme. Checking Absolute Migration has been difficult
due to above stated reasons but relatively lowered. Earlier, they migrated in
non-farming months only and used to grow crops in kharif/rabi seasons back at
home. But now apart from these months, they also work here in MGNREGS season
(post-rainy season).
Thus, the 3rd
“F” i.e Funds and heneceforth the scheme has witnessed the dawn, dusk and dawn
(of next day). As a fellow working at the grassroots level and numerous others
sincerely expect that the scheme no longer faces dusk. The intensity of
day-light gets increased with time via creation of sustainable assets for rural
development.
The conclusion of the article is left for its readers to frame and put in comments section below. Through this article, I have attempted to explain this scheme’s ground realities and issues via 3 F’s not in an academic (for publishing in Yojana etc.) but in a common day-to-day lingua. I would be privileged to know the experiences of yours regarding rural development in general and this scheme in specific. Sorry for making it a bit technical but have tried my level best to make it understandable for all, in case if still clarifications are needed, please comment. The essence of the blog is expected to be comprehended and reach to ALL.
Rural
Development is more than just providing schemes, but equipping the rural
population with what they need (as per their own requirements). It’s a process
of societal development and transformation.
"मनरेगा नहीं मरेगा " The past, present and future lies in India's villages, so आगे बढ़ो और गाँव के समृद्ध भविष्य का हिस्सा बनो। वो दिन दूर नहीं जब गाँव हमसे यह सवाल पूछेगा कि क्या हमने अपने फर्ज़ का निर्वाह किया। सोचो और आगे बढ़ो।
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your views, opinions and feedback on the piece. They will help me to write better by working on the suggested areas of improvement.